Guatemala genocide trial suspended – take action

The historically important trial of ex-dictator of Guatemala J.E. Rios Montt (see previous post) has been suspended (not by the trial judges but by another judge).  This potentially increases risks for complainants, witnesses (including psychology colleagues) and human rights activists, and if the trial were anulled it would mean strangthened impunity in Guatemala, the region and beyond. There is a petition here http://www.ghrc-usa.org/  from the Guatemala Human Rights Commission, demanding the reinstatement of the proceedings – please take a look and add your support.
ALl the detail is on the excellent website for the trial http://www.riosmontt-trial.org/  [o en castellano http://es.riosmontt-trial.org/] and the summary dated today 25/04/13 is a good summary of the last few days’ legal proceedings.  The constitutional court is reviewing the decision to annul the trial and has ruled on some points but is still to rule on others.

Share

9th European Congress of Community Psychology BEYOND THE CRISIS

9th European Congress of Community Psychology

BEYOND THE CRISIS
BUILDING COMMUNITY AND CRITICAL VISIONS TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE, FAIRNESS AND WELL-BEING
Naples / Napoli
Italy / Italia
7th-9th  November 2013
Closing date for submissions: 20/05/2013
Share

Guatemalan Genocide Trial: Prosecution experts testify on psychological issues

The following is taken, with some minor edits, from the Trial Website

Background:

Ex-dictator Efrain Rios Montt

Jose Efrain Rios Montt, who ruled Guatemala for nearly seventeen months during 1982 and 1983, and Jose Mauricio Rodriguez Sanchez, his then chief of military intelligence, are on trial in Guatemala City for genocide and crimes against humanity. The charges arise from systematic massacres of the country’s indigenous population carried out by Guatemalan troops and paramilitary forces during this phase of the country’s long and brutal civil war, and the related mass forced displacement.

This is the first time a former head of state has been prosecuted for genocide in a national, as opposed to an international, court. The trial is an important milestone in holding political and military leaders accountable for international crimes. For Guatemalans, it is hoped it will also contribute to an accurate historical account of the gross human rights violations committed during the civil war….

A United Nations sponsored truth commission established under the peace agreement that ended the civil war in 1996 estimated that more than 200,000 died or were subjected to forced disappearance during the 36-year conflict, over 80% from Mayan indigenous populations. The commission found that state security personnel and paramilitaries were responsible for 93 percent of the violations. The commission identified over 600 massacres, and found that the state was responsible for systematic violence – including extrajudicial executions, forced disappearances, sexual violence, death squads, the denial of justice, and other crimes and violations, with the victims largely from indigenous and rural communities. The three-year period between 1981 and 1983 accounts for 81 percent of the violations.

Psychological Evidence presented in court

On 13th April, the first expert witness was Nieves Gómez, a psychologist with a specialty in criminology. She testified about the psychological impacts of the war and the “harm to the mental integrity” of individuals and the Maya Ixil community. Gómez told the court she had interviewed about 100 people in several Maya Ixil communities. Those interviews highlighted the interplay and reciprocity between the individual and the group.

She mentioned several aspects of everyday life specific to the Maya Ixil community, including profound respect for nature and the dead, spiritual ceremonies for specific events, language, the special place of animals, women’s roles in transmitting culture within the family and the role of elders in regulating community norms and resolving conflicts.

Gómez then described certain traumatic occurrences and their impact on people in the community. During massacres, people were divided with men on one side and women and children on the other. The massacres were not events that took place on a single, isolated occasion but were carried out over a period of time, resulting in “extreme terror” and vulnerability among the people before they were killed.

Those who were able to flee into the mountains suffered other impacts. They lived in an “emotional climate of terror” (“clima emocional de terror”). Making the situation worse was the fact that the army forced the population to give names of guerrillas and if they did not do so, they were threatened or killed. Community members were also forced to serve in the Civil Self-Defense Patrols (Patrullas de Autodefensa Civil, PACs). This created conditions in which no one trusted each other.

Read more on Rios Montt trial website.

Thanks to Anita for drawing this to our attention.

Photo-essay on exhumations in Guatemala – note several psychologists working within the community / liberation psychology frameworks have been part of interdisciplinary teams working on this difficult task – both finding evidence of he genocidal acts and also working with the Maya communities to commemorate the atrocities and honour the dead – recovery of historical memory being a key concept and tool in liberation psychology.

More information in Spanish

Share

Responding to contemporary crises: an ethical action framework.

This is the text of the lecture given by Mark Burton, recipient of the 2013 British Psychological Society award for promoting equality of opportunity, at the BPS Annual Conference, Harrogate, Yorkshire, 10th April, 2013.  The title is Responding to contemporary crises: an ethical action framework.  Maybe it doesn’t quite offer such a framework, but the lecture does try to explore some of the factors that make this necessary. It focuses in two contemporary crises, recent scandals in health and social welfare and the ecological crisis of climate change.  It introduces the concept of ideology-action-structure complexes and links the hegemonic ones to the overall ideology-action-structure complex of coloniality, introduced from 1492.  It contrasts professional ethical codes with the liberation ethics of Enrique Dussel and draws on Maritza Montero’s characterisation of the new liberatory and decolonising social science paradigm, adding an emphasis on the role of the public intellectual.  A more extended treatment of some of the themes can be found in the working paper: The mess we’re in.

Share

Martín-Baró in English?

There has been recent discussion on the openlibpsy discussion list about the possibility of

Ignacio Martín-Baró photo with guitar

Ignacio Martín-Baró

translation of more of Ignacio Martín-Baró’s works into English.  Sadly this doesn’t seem to be an immediate possibility, but we have just posted two interviews from 1985 and 1987 on the documents page. [Initially there were some problems with the 2 files but this now corrected - 9/4/2013 3.16pm BST.]  If you have any material in English by Martín-Baró then please do share it.
Why not join the discussion list and join in the discussion?

 

Share

Facebook

I’m not a fan of facebook but, well, a lot of people use it.  There is a facebook group with very similar interests (and overlapping membership with this network).  And you can go straight there (without having to fight through all the other trivia) with this link.  Thanks to Ana Eugenia for establishing the group and to Rod for bringing it to my attention.   Posts from this site should now feed there automatically.

 

 

Share

Call for abstracts – book on the personal debt industry

 Call for Abstracts
The Personal Debt Industry: International Perspectives 
(tentative title)
 
eds. Serdar M. Değirmencioğlu  & Carl Walker
Recent years have seen a considerable and sustained boom in personal debt in many countries around the world. There also appears to be a growing consensus that experiences of over-indebtedness are associated with very considerable distress and suffering.
Policy formulation on personal debt management in recent years has had a tendency to sideline problematic macroscopic political and economic changes and instead locate experiences of personal debt as problems of individual financial incompetence. The problem of over-indebtedness and financial suffering has become changeable through the proficiency of a growing number of financial experts whose remit is to provide individual solutions for naïve financial decision makers. In doing so, economic and social policies that have brought about a greater need for a greater number of people to rely on personal debt remain largely beyond public view.
With this book we intend to bring together examples from around the world that illustrate the international differences and commonalities with regards to the economic, political and psychosocial contexts of personal debt. In so doing we intend to understand the growing problem of personal debt, not only as an issue of personal conduct, but as an often problematic nexus of corporate, political and economic forces that serve to locate people within national and international industries of debt and debt management.
We invite initial interest from scholars, activists and interested parties around the world who may be able to contribute to the following aspects:
1. Describe the nature and extent of the problem in a given context (i.e., country, region, etc.);
2. Explore the strategies and practices of the financial and non-financial institutions that have worked to sustain problematic debt industries;
3. Exploring the psychosocial impact of a range of debt industries around the world;
4. Consideration of how psychology has operated to serve and sustain debt industries;
5. Consideration of how cycles of debt can be disrupted.
Important dates
April 1 – Deadline for abstracts
April 15 – Decisions regarding abstracts and feedback to potential contributors
September 1 – Deadline for first chapter drafts
October 1 – Feedback to authors
December 15 – Deadline for revised chapters
Correspondence
Please send a 500-word abstract to Serdar M. Değirmencioğlu <serdardegirmencioglu@gmail.com>.

 

Share

UNHCR AWARD FOR STATELESSNESS RESEARCH

Network members might be interested in this – a possibility for doing liberatory work?
Together with Tilburg University (Netherlands), (United Nations High Commission on Refugees) UNHCR has established a UNHCR Award for Statelessness Research. The Award will be administered by Tilburg and a call for nominations has already been announced for 2013. A prize pool of € 3,000 will be distributed among the winners in three categories for research at the undergraduate, masters and doctorate levels, as decided by the jury comprised of members from UNHCR and Tilburg as well as other leading academic institutions drawn from all geographic regions. Through this award, UNHCR and the Statelessness Programme will be able to map existing research, identify promising young researchers within the field and monitor ongoing gaps in geographic and thematic coverage of research. This is an innovative way for UNHCR to respond to the request by the Executive Committee in Conclusion 106 to promote research on statelessness. The closing date for nominations for the inaugural award is 1 May 2013, and the winners will be announced on 28 September each year, to coincide with the date of adoption of the 1954 Statelessness Convention.

Further details are available at: http://www.unhcr.org/512628ab6.html

UNHCR STATELESSNESS FORUM

Also in coordination with Tilburg University, UNHCR will co-host an international conference on statelessness in September 2014 to coincide with the 60th anniversary of the 1954 Statelessness Convention. Entitled “The First Global Forum on Statelessness: New Research and Policy Perspectives”, the conference will be a three-day event, inviting leading academics, international institutions, governmental representatives, NGOs and stateless persons themselves.  The event will be multi-disciplinary and have a strong emphasis on policy as opposed to being purely academic. The conference aims to raise awareness, encourage new research, create dialogue and galvanize action on statelessness within the academic and legal communities, government and civil society actors, the media and stateless people themselves. A pre-announcement for the conference is available at:  http://www.unhcr.org/5141e6a29.html

Share

Twitter

Liberation Psychology now has a twitter account.
Follow us at https://twitter.com/SteadyStateMcr   or tweet us at @LiberationPsyEn


Share

Revealed: Pentagon’s link to Iraqi torture centres | World news | The Guardian

Revealed: Pentagon’s link to Iraqi torture centres | World news | The Guardian.
Why is this relevant to libpsy.org?   Because the torture and counter-insurgency methods developed by the USA in Vietnam and perfected in Central America were later exported to Iraq and Guantanamo.  This investigation traces some of the lineage.  For psychology there have been at least three developments from this.
1)  The Central American context of conflict, counter-insurgency, torture and impunity led to Martín-Baró’s proposals on liberation psychology, and of course his own death was the result of this terror complex.
2)  The development of work on the recovery of historical memory, social-psychotherapeutic approaches, use of testimonies,  commemoration, etc. in various locations in Latin America also has its roots in this nexus.  These ideas are also of interest in other locations such as Turkey with its own legacy of State terror.
3)  The “APA controversy” on the involvement of organised psychology and military psychologists in interrogation and torture again comes from this latest phase of the US use of organised terror.
Congratulations to the Guardian and BBC Arabic service for this investigation.

Of related interest, see this article by Victoria Brittain:  Shadow Lives
How the War on Terror in England Became a War on Women and Children

Share