The historically important trial of ex-dictator of Guatemala J.E. Rios Montt (see previous post) has been suspended (not by the trial judges but by another judge). This potentially increases risks for complainants, witnesses (including psychology colleagues) and human rights activists, and if the trial were anulled it would mean strangthened impunity in Guatemala, the region and beyond. There is a petition here http://www.ghrc-usa.org/ from the Guatemala Human Rights Commission, demanding the reinstatement of the proceedings – please take a look and add your support.
ALl the detail is on the excellent website for the trial http://www.riosmontt-trial.org/ [o en castellano http://es.riosmontt-trial.org/] and the summary dated today 25/04/13 is a good summary of the last few days’ legal proceedings. The constitutional court is reviewing the decision to annul the trial and has ruled on some points but is still to rule on others.
9th European Congress of Community Psychology BEYOND THE CRISIS
9th European Congress of Community Psychology
Guatemalan Genocide Trial: Prosecution experts testify on psychological issues
The following is taken, with some minor edits, from the Trial Website

Ex-dictator Efrain Rios Montt
Jose Efrain Rios Montt, who ruled Guatemala for nearly seventeen months during 1982 and 1983, and Jose Mauricio Rodriguez Sanchez, his then chief of military intelligence, are on trial in Guatemala City for genocide and crimes against humanity. The charges arise from systematic massacres of the country’s indigenous population carried out by Guatemalan troops and paramilitary forces during this phase of the country’s long and brutal civil war, and the related mass forced displacement.
This is the first time a former head of state has been prosecuted for genocide in a national, as opposed to an international, court. The trial is an important milestone in holding political and military leaders accountable for international crimes. For Guatemalans, it is hoped it will also contribute to an accurate historical account of the gross human rights violations committed during the civil war….
A United Nations sponsored truth commission established under the peace agreement that ended the civil war in 1996 estimated that more than 200,000 died or were subjected to forced disappearance during the 36-year conflict, over 80% from Mayan indigenous populations. The commission found that state security personnel and paramilitaries were responsible for 93 percent of the violations. The commission identified over 600 massacres, and found that the state was responsible for systematic violence – including extrajudicial executions, forced disappearances, sexual violence, death squads, the denial of justice, and other crimes and violations, with the victims largely from indigenous and rural communities. The three-year period between 1981 and 1983 accounts for 81 percent of the violations.
Psychological Evidence presented in court
On 13th April, the first expert witness was Nieves Gómez, a psychologist with a specialty in criminology. She testified about the psychological impacts of the war and the “harm to the mental integrity” of individuals and the Maya Ixil community. Gómez told the court she had interviewed about 100 people in several Maya Ixil communities. Those interviews highlighted the interplay and reciprocity between the individual and the group.
She mentioned several aspects of everyday life specific to the Maya Ixil community, including profound respect for nature and the dead, spiritual ceremonies for specific events, language, the special place of animals, women’s roles in transmitting culture within the family and the role of elders in regulating community norms and resolving conflicts.
Gómez then described certain traumatic occurrences and their impact on people in the community. During massacres, people were divided with men on one side and women and children on the other. The massacres were not events that took place on a single, isolated occasion but were carried out over a period of time, resulting in “extreme terror” and vulnerability among the people before they were killed.
Those who were able to flee into the mountains suffered other impacts. They lived in an “emotional climate of terror” (“clima emocional de terror”). Making the situation worse was the fact that the army forced the population to give names of guerrillas and if they did not do so, they were threatened or killed. Community members were also forced to serve in the Civil Self-Defense Patrols (Patrullas de Autodefensa Civil, PACs). This created conditions in which no one trusted each other.
Read more on Rios Montt trial website.
Thanks to Anita for drawing this to our attention.
Photo-essay on exhumations in Guatemala – note several psychologists working within the community / liberation psychology frameworks have been part of interdisciplinary teams working on this difficult task – both finding evidence of he genocidal acts and also working with the Maya communities to commemorate the atrocities and honour the dead – recovery of historical memory being a key concept and tool in liberation psychology.
Responding to contemporary crises: an ethical action framework.
This is the text of the lecture given by Mark Burton, recipient of the 2013 British Psychological Society award for promoting equality of opportunity, at the BPS Annual Conference, Harrogate, Yorkshire, 10th April, 2013. The title is Responding to contemporary crises: an ethical action framework. Maybe it doesn’t quite offer such a framework, but the lecture does try to explore some of the factors that make this necessary. It focuses in two contemporary crises, recent scandals in health and social welfare and the ecological crisis of climate change. It introduces the concept of ideology-action-structure complexes and links the hegemonic ones to the overall ideology-action-structure complex of coloniality, introduced from 1492. It contrasts professional ethical codes with the liberation ethics of Enrique Dussel and draws on Maritza Montero’s characterisation of the new liberatory and decolonising social science paradigm, adding an emphasis on the role of the public intellectual. A more extended treatment of some of the themes can be found in the working paper: The mess we’re in.
Martín-Baró in English?
There has been recent discussion on the openlibpsy discussion list about the possibility of
translation of more of Ignacio Martín-Baró’s works into English. Sadly this doesn’t seem to be an immediate possibility, but we have just posted two interviews from 1985 and 1987 on the documents page. [Initially there were some problems with the 2 files but this now corrected - 9/4/2013 3.16pm BST.] If you have any material in English by Martín-Baró then please do share it.
Why not join the discussion list and join in the discussion?
I’m not a fan of facebook but, well, a lot of people use it. There is a facebook group with very similar interests (and overlapping membership with this network). And you can go straight there (without having to fight through all the other trivia) with this link. Thanks to Ana Eugenia for establishing the group and to Rod for bringing it to my attention. Posts from this site should now feed there automatically.
Call for abstracts – book on the personal debt industry
UNHCR AWARD FOR STATELESSNESS RESEARCH
Further details are available at: http://www.unhcr.org/512628ab6.html
UNHCR STATELESSNESS FORUM
Also in coordination with Tilburg University, UNHCR will co-host an international conference on statelessness in September 2014 to coincide with the 60th anniversary of the 1954 Statelessness Convention. Entitled “The First Global Forum on Statelessness: New Research and Policy Perspectives”, the conference will be a three-day event, inviting leading academics, international institutions, governmental representatives, NGOs and stateless persons themselves. The event will be multi-disciplinary and have a strong emphasis on policy as opposed to being purely academic. The conference aims to raise awareness, encourage new research, create dialogue and galvanize action on statelessness within the academic and legal communities, government and civil society actors, the media and stateless people themselves. A pre-announcement for the conference is available at: http://www.unhcr.org/5141e6a29.html
Liberation Psychology now has a twitter account.
Follow us at https://twitter.com/SteadyStateMcr or tweet us at @LiberationPsyEn
Revealed: Pentagon’s link to Iraqi torture centres | World news | The Guardian
Revealed: Pentagon’s link to Iraqi torture centres | World news | The Guardian.
Why is this relevant to libpsy.org? Because the torture and counter-insurgency methods developed by the USA in Vietnam and perfected in Central America were later exported to Iraq and Guantanamo. This investigation traces some of the lineage. For psychology there have been at least three developments from this.
1) The Central American context of conflict, counter-insurgency, torture and impunity led to Martín-Baró’s proposals on liberation psychology, and of course his own death was the result of this terror complex.
2) The development of work on the recovery of historical memory, social-psychotherapeutic approaches, use of testimonies, commemoration, etc. in various locations in Latin America also has its roots in this nexus. These ideas are also of interest in other locations such as Turkey with its own legacy of State terror.
3) The “APA controversy” on the involvement of organised psychology and military psychologists in interrogation and torture again comes from this latest phase of the US use of organised terror.
Congratulations to the Guardian and BBC Arabic service for this investigation.
Of related interest, see this article by Victoria Brittain: Shadow Lives
How the War on Terror in England Became a War on Women and Children

